Editorial
Abstract
The scientific interest in health and well-being demands well-founded research strategies in order for the complexities, the depth, and the many nuances of health-related phenomena to be thoroughly explored. Often, but not always,1 the scientific/ philosophical inspiration is made clear. In many qualitative research approaches, phenomenology and/or hermeneutics serve as the ontological, epistemological, and methodological foundation. Some authors employ phenomenological approaches, philosophically referring to Husserl or Merleau-Ponty and methodologically to, for example, Giorgi. Others describe their approaches as hermeneutical, referring philosophically to Heidegger, Ricoeur, or Gadamer and methodologically to, for example, van Manen. The essential distinction is description versus interpretation. Phenomenological supporters usually emphasise description while the hermeneutical supporters emphasise interpretation.
(Published: 30 December 2010)
Citation: Int J Qualitative Stud Health Well-being 2010, 5: 5800 - DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v5i4.5800
(Published: 30 December 2010)
Citation: Int J Qualitative Stud Health Well-being 2010, 5: 5800 - DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v5i4.5800
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being eISSN 1748-2631, [ISSN 1748-2623 volumes 1-4, 2006-2009]
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. Responsible editor: Lillemor Hallberg.